Values Test

A calm look at what steers your choices right now, with no good or bad answers, only a snapshot of today.

≈5 min Questions: 24

A young donkey standing on a sunlit garden path beside a stone cottage, with a wooden gate and blossoming trees behind

If you’re here, you may have wondered lately what actually moves you. This test does not judge whether you are a good person; it shows how what you care about is arranged right now. Choose the answer that feels closest today, not the one that sounds best. It takes about five minutes, and at the end you see which of four broad orientations leads, along with your profile across all four. Sometimes it helps just to see what you find yourself protecting.

0%
A stubborn problem has a standard fix that everyone recommends, and your own idea points somewhere else.
You finish a long, effortful day and take stock of how it went.
Your ordinary day loses its shape: plans shift, timings slip, and nothing goes the way it usually goes.
A close friend has gone quiet lately, and nobody has asked you to check in.
You have made up your mind about something, and the choice looks obvious from where you stand.
Away from any single day, think about what success means to you in general.
The news says rules and institutions around you are being shaken up, while your own days stay calm.
Think about how the people around you describe you when something has been promised.
Everyone around you has joined an easy, ready-made challenge, and you have a harder project of your own in mind.
A group needs to settle where to go, and nobody is speaking up.
An old custom passed down to you takes real effort to keep up this year, and letting it lapse would be easy.
You are choosing between two options, and one treats strangers far away less fairly than the other.
Think about the plans you work from in general, whoever drew them up.
Any shared undertaking has a seat for the one who directs and a seat for those who follow.
A procedure comes with a set of written steps, and skipping one would go unnoticed.
You are buying something ordinary, and nothing in the shop mentions what it does to the environment.
Two options are on the table for tonight: a place you know well and one nobody you know has tried.
A sum of money has landed in your hands and you have to decide what it is for.
A friend plays you a new song and asks what you think, and your honest reaction is lukewarm.
At a gathering, someone argues for a view that sits far from yours.
Picture a long stretch where every day unfolds exactly like the last.
Think about what money and belongings are mainly for, in general.
Think about what an old custom means to you, apart from how convenient it is.
Think about fairness, and about people far away whom you have never met.

Maryna Lyadneva psychologist

Send this test

How this test works

Where the questions come from, what the scale rests on, and why the result is not a diagnosis.

The test measures which of four broad value orientations (openness to change, self-enhancement, conservation and self-transcendence) a person's answers lean toward today, with a profile across all four.

Author Maryna Lyadneva

Rate this test
5.0/5
Methodology

Each result answers one question: toward which of four broad directions do the answers lean most? The directions come from a well-known theory of personal values, which treats a value as something a person holds important and arranges values around a circle. Directions that go together easily sit side by side, and those across the circle tend to pull apart. They are called openness to change, self-enhancement, conservation and self-transcendence.

The questions were written for this test, six for each direction, and each takes a different everyday situation or general leaning. Answers run from weakly to strongly expressed, the totals form a profile of four scales, and the highest is named as the main result. The answers are the respondent's own description, which is also the usual route in the field, described in more detail in the reference material on measurement methods.

Two things keep the picture modest. For two of the four pairs of neighboring directions, the theory's own literature cannot draw a clean line, so those edges are described through what people do. And since the data are self-descriptions, a value that sounds admirable can be rated higher than it shows in how a person lives. A result is where the answers pointed today, not a settled trait, a ranking, or a guide for choosing work, relationships or a direction in life.

The test is not a diagnostic instrument and does not stand in for a specialist.

Questions

How is a values test different from a personality test?

Personality is about how someone typically behaves, and it holds fairly steady from early on. Values are about what someone treats as important enough to protect, and these can move across life stages.

Can my values change?

They can. Values shift over the years, most noticeably in early adulthood. Coming back to the test later and getting a different lean is normal, and it does not mean the first result was wrong.

Does the result say which career or relationship suits me?

It does not go that far. What you get is the direction your answers pointed today. Choices about work, people or where to live depend on much more than that.

What are personal values?

Values are the things held up as worth caring about: the standards behind calling something good, and the reasons a person defends certain things and goes after others.

How many values should matter most?

A handful tends to be the natural size. Once a list of values grows long and nobody ranks it, everything on it counts equally, and nothing steers. That is why the test folds a wide range of specific values into four broad directions.

Sources
  1. Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An Overview of the Schwartz Theory of Basic Values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). doi:10.9707/2307-0919.1116
  2. Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Davidov, E., Fischer, R., Beierlein, C., Ramos, A., Verkasalo, M., Lönnqvist, J.-E., Demirutku, K., Dirilen-Gumus, O., & Konty, M. (2012). Refining the Theory of Basic Individual Values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(4), 663–688.
  3. Rokeach, M. (1973). The Nature of Human Values. New York: Free Press.